阅读视图
Die Sacherläuterungen in der digitalen Editorik. Auf der Suche nach der Best Practice
Sonifikation. Vermittlungsansätze zwischen Klang und Information
Overseas reception of English translations of Journey to the West: Temporal dynamics, cross-platform sentiment patterns, and topic modeling
PLoS One. 2026 Apr 21;21(4):e0347253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347253. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
The overseas reception of classical literature through online platforms presents a critical lens for understanding cross-cultural dynamics in the digital age. This study investigates the overseas reception of English translations of Journey to the West by analyzing a corpus of 1,795 reviews from Amazon and Goodreads to examine temporal dynamics, cross-platform sentiment patterns, and topic modeling. The analysis covers four celebrated translators: Arthur Waley, Anthony C. Yu, Julia Lovell, and W.J.F. Jenner. Methodologically, we developed a hybrid sentiment lexicon by integrating a domain sentiment lexicon with AFINN, NRC, and VADER through weighted fusion, addressing the limited adaptability of general sentiment lexicons in translated literature analysis. LDA modeling was further applied to enable data-driven theme extraction. Key findings reveal a consistent year-on-year increase in review counts across all translations. Notably, despite an overall positive sentiment, significant cross-platform divergences emerge, reflecting the distinct evaluative mechanisms of digital platforms. Thematic analysis identifies three central reader concerns: translation quality, plot acceptance, and character portrayal, with plot acceptance exhibiting markedly higher negativity. Furthermore, translator-level analysis reveals performance variations across these themes. This study demonstrates how digital platforms reconfigure the valuation of literary translation, and pioneers a methodological framework for capturing the dynamic interplay between reader perception, media infrastructure, and textual mobility, offering new pathways for digital humanities research in translation studies.
PMID:42013105 | PMC:PMC13098970 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0347253
Reconfiguring the Ideal Order: Ablation and Field Formation in the Twentieth-Century Nigerian Novel in English
Infrastructures of Listening: The ManoWhisper Podcast Analysis Pipeline
The Eras Tour: Machine Learning for Dating Historical Texts from Greco-Roman Egypt
Digital bioethics: exploring an emerging field
Med Health Care Philos. 2026 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s11019-026-10347-1. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
The uptake of social science methods by bioethics significantly expanded its methodological spectrum, raising new theoretical, methodological, and practical questions. Recently, we are witnessing another trend, adding advanced data science methods to bioethics' toolkit to aid, for example, in online data analysis, support scholarly writing, and inform clinical ethics. This article explores the emerging field of Digital Bioethics across its dimensions by analysing the tangled relationship between topics and methods, highlighting intersections between Digital Bioethics and Bioethics of the Digital, and advocating for a methods-based definition of the field. The use of advanced data science methods within bioethics must be interpreted in the context of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health care. At the same time, it presents unique opportunities and challenges. Defining, and thus demarcating, Digital Bioethics can create support for the new field but also requires navigating trade-offs. To do so, we take four kindred academic fields as points of comparison (Digital Humanities, Experimental Philosophical Bioethics, computational medicine and digitised biology) to analyse what each of them teaches for critically assessing and further developing Digital Bioethics. The article discusses potential pitfalls and concludes with recommendations on how the field can fully develop its potential to promote bioethical research and argument. Furthermore, the article discusses how a critical reflection of the use of AI methods within bioethics itself will also contribute to the ethical oversight of increasingly AI-driven branches of healthcare.
PMID:41989660 | DOI:10.1007/s11019-026-10347-1